A Corpus-Assisted Study on the Co-existence of Standard British and American Englishes in the Age of Globalization in Pakistan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3456/skqmbh02Keywords:
Standard British English (SBE), American English, Pakistani English, Post-colonial nation, sociolinguistics, globalization, corpus, World EnglishnessAbstract
This research documents a comprehensive empirical documentation of the co-existence of Standard British English (SBE) and American Englishes (AmE) in modern Pakistan. This perspective leaves a critical gap within the existing sociolinguistics literature. The research employed a mixed-method approach, a sort of triangulation technique to investigate the empirical evidence collected from Pakistani corpus of 50,000 words, interviews (N-10), and questionnaires (N=50). The findings depict that the use of different terms from each standard variety is not random but a structured process. A clear clash emerged between the perceived prestige of Standard British English which is linked with official documentation, and the perceived utility of American English which is further associated with globalization and digitization. This majorly points towards the term “stratified diglossia” where the use of Standard British and American English within Pakistani English highlight depends on the context users are in. The respondents also reported the use of code-mixing, code-switching, and linguistic schizophrenia which is mostly context-driven. Consequently, the co-existence of British and American English is not a competition but a structured process and functional distribution which revolves around complex, dual-identity of a post-colonial country.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 International Research Journal of Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Disclaimer: The International Research Journal of Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences (IRJAHSS) upholds the principles of open access, ensuring unrestricted access to scholarly content to foster the sharing and advancement of knowledge. The opinions expressed in the articles solely belong to the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the journal's editorial team, editorial board, advisory board or research institute.
