A Comparative Study of Public Sector Tenth Grade Learners' Ability in the Placement of Word Stress in Pronunciation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3456/v89aq169Keywords:
word stress, pronunciation, Audio-Lingual Method, Communicative Language Teaching, Grammar-Translation Method, ESL learnersAbstract
This study investigated the ability of public sector tenth-grade learners to place word stress accurately in English pronunciation and examined the effectiveness of different teaching methods in improving this skill. A quasi-experimental design was employed with 120 students divided into four groups: a control group taught through the traditional method and three experimental groups taught through the Grammar-Translation Method (GTM), Communicative Language Teaching (CLT), and the Audio-Lingual Method (ALM). Pre-tests and post-tests were administered to assess learners’ performance in stress in pronunciation, sentence stress placement, and stress in context. The pre-test results indicated no significant differences among the groups, showing that they were homogeneous before the treatment. However, the post-test results revealed significant differences among the groups. The Audio-Lingual Method group achieved the greatest improvement in all areas of word stress placement, followed by the CLT and GTM groups, while the control group showed the least improvement. The findings suggest that teaching methods emphasizing listening, repetition, and oral practice are more effective in improving learners’ pronunciation skills. Therefore, it is recommended that the Audio-Lingual Method be adopted or integrated into pronunciation instruction to enhance learners’ ability to place word stress correctly.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 International Research Journal of Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Disclaimer: The International Research Journal of Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences (IRJAHSS) upholds the principles of open access, ensuring unrestricted access to scholarly content to foster the sharing and advancement of knowledge. The opinions expressed in the articles solely belong to the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the journal's editorial team, editorial board, advisory board or research institute.
