PSYCHOLOGICAL INTERVENTION AND VOLLEYBALL PERFORMANCE AMONG UNIVERSITY ATHLETES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3456/189hv726Keywords:
psychological skills training, volleyball performance, competitive anxiety, team cohesion, imagery, university sport, Pakistan, mental preparationAbstract
This study examined the relationship between psychological skills and competitive performance among university volleyball players in Pakistan. Using a cross-sectional survey design, 250 players (62% male; Mage = 21.6 years, SD = 2.4) from the University of the Education, Lahore and University of the Punjab, Lahore completed a 28-item expert-validated instrument assessing nine psychological dimensions: imagery, mental preparation, self-confidence, anxiety management, concentration, relaxation, motivation, team cohesion, and pre-competition routine. Chi-square analysis, independent samples t-tests, and one-way ANOVA were applied. Strong positive profiles were identified across all dimensions: 88.0% endorsed systematic performance analysis, 86.8% affirmed team cohesion enhanced performance, 85.2% reported high motivational readiness, and 84.8% felt mentally prepared before competition. No significant differences emerged by gender (t(248) = −0.844, p = .530) or age group (F(2, 247) = 1.104, p = .618). Two areas warranted targeted intervention: calming self-efficacy (Q17: 30% neutral) and structured self-talk use (Q27: lowest endorsement). Findings support integration of formalised psychological skills training into Pakistani university volleyball programmes.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 International Research Journal of Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Disclaimer: The International Research Journal of Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences (IRJAHSS) upholds the principles of open access, ensuring unrestricted access to scholarly content to foster the sharing and advancement of knowledge. The opinions expressed in the articles solely belong to the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the journal's editorial team, editorial board, advisory board or research institute.
